This letter was referred to the authors, who respond as follows:
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
This paper is organized as follows
As Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) power consumption continues to increase, lower power FPGA circuitry, architectures, and Computer-Aided Design (CAD) tools need to be developed. Before designing low-power FPGA circuitry, architectures, or CAD tools, we must first determine where the biggest savings (in terms of energy dissipation) are to be made and whether these savings are cumulative. I...
متن کاملThe authors respond to Egilman.
Dr. Egilman highlights the need for testing of chemicals prior to their use by workers and consumption by the public [Egilman, 2014]. We agree that the demonstrated toxicity of diacetyl illustrates the need for testing and great vigilance regarding diacetyl substitutes, other flavoring chemicals, and chemicals involved in flavor manufacture, and that such an approach would better ensure the saf...
متن کاملWho Wrote This Code? Identifying the Authors of Program Binaries
Program authorship attribution—identifying a programmer based on stylistic characteristics of code—has practical implications for detecting software theft, digital forensics, and malware analysis. Authorship attribution is challenging in these domains where usually only binary code is available; existing source code-based approaches to attribution have left unclear whether and to what extent pr...
متن کاملAuthors' response to letter to the editor.
We thank Drs. Mandal and Goel for their interest in our work, but we disagree with their interpretation of the literature compared with our findings. While Waldert and associates did indeed find a correlation between a longer delay to nephroureterectomy (NUx) and more advanced stage, they did not report metastasis-free survival. Moreover, they found no difference in cancer-specific survival. Th...
متن کاملLetter to the Editor: Authors' Response.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the concerns of Dr Reneman and colleagues about our paper, Kersnovske et al. [13]. Dr Reneman and colleagues have raised two issues that we address below. Their first concern relates to the use of experts for the purpose of validation. We assume the authors are not concerned with the use of experts as a method of content validation, per se, as this is...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Oncology
سال: 1997
ISSN: 0923-7534
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010895